EMIGRATION O'Dwyer, George. "Irish Migrations to America (1861-1865)". Journal of the American Irish Historical Society, 1932. Vol XXX. New York: American Irish Historical Society , 1932 In the American Civil War (1861-1865)
there were large migrations of Irish laborers and tradesmen from English and
Irish ports to America. Various reasons were assigned for this exodus of
able-bodied men. Confederate agents and English sympathizers ascribed it as the
work of Federal Army agents in Queenstown, Galway, Cork, Dublin, and other port
towns in the Emerald Isle. The United States Government repeated, again and
again, through its Minister, Charles Francis Adams in London, that it was a
migration of able-bodied men to fill the places of those drafted into the
Northern armies. These draftees were put to work on farms, in the wheat fields,
in factories, on railroads, and in the mines; wherever labor was necessary for
the building of new enterprises. Their passages were paid from Irish and English
ports to New York. From New York, they scattered to different points; some,
attracted by the settlements and enterprises of the West and Middle West;
others, by the fact that their relatives were in the cities and towns in and
near the Eastern seaboard. Fitzgerald, James. "The Causes that Led to Irish Emigration". Journal of the American Irish Historical Society, 1911. Vol X. New York: American Irish Historical Society , 1911
THE CAUSES THAT LED TO IRISH EMIGRATION. AN ADDRESS BY THE HON. JAMES FITZGERALD. I am very thankful to my old and valued
friend, your distinguished Chairman, Hon. Morgan J. O’Brien, for his more than
kindly introduction, and deeply grateful to you for the cordiality of your
reception. We are all to be congratulated upon the opportunity afforded us of
participating in the Silver Jubilee of the Mission of the Holy Rosary. The good
work the Mission has accomplished for immigrant girls during the past
twenty-five years has earned international recognition, and as we listened
to the highly interesting and very eloquent address of Father Henry, the history
and details of the splendid services performed by himself and his lamented
predecessors on behalf of morality and religion, were deeply impressive. We wish
the Mission God-speed for the future, and ardently hope that as long as young
Irish girls must emigrate, they may find to greet them at the portals of the New
World, the good priests of the Mission ready to guard them against the pitfalls
of the tempter and profligate, and to point out to them the secure roadways over
which they may unfalteringly advance by industry and virtue to win fortune and
friendship on these hospitable shores. I have been requested to speak this
evening on the causes that led to Irish emigration, and in opening, can
truthfully say that with the vast majority, emigration was not a matter of
choice. The Penal Laws. Religious persecution, as exemplified by the Penal Laws, hardly tended to make Ireland a desirable place to live in for Roman Catholics. By these statutes, a person professing that faith was prohibited from acquiring land in fee or by leasehold; his tenure was at sufferance; he could not hold an estate in land, nor of personal property, nor could he be the owner of a single chattel worth more than five pounds; he could not educate his children under penalty of transportation; he could not worship in the sacred sanctuaries of his Church without rendering himself liable to persecution. He had no property rights, no personal rights, So completely were Irish Catholics, who constituted the vast majority of the population, bereft of their civil rights, so absolutely were they without legal redress to prevent or remedy wrongs that the Lord Chancellor and Chief Justice of Ireland in those days solemnly declared from the bench that "the law does not contemplate the existence of any such person as an Irish Roman Catholic." Restrictive Trade Laws. These Penal Laws, which were directed against conscience were supplemented by industrial statutes which were directed against industry and trade. When it was discovered that Ireland could undersell England in woollen fabrics, and thus became her dangerous competitor in the markets of the world, the exportation of woollen cloth from Ireland to any part of the earth other than England and Wales was absolutely prohibited, and a prohibitive tariff was laid upon manufactured woolen goods entering English or Welsh ports. Under those circumstances, is it any wonder that the woolen industry died out in Ireland, and is it surprising that English woolen factories flourished? And then there were the Navigation Laws. With the character of these Navigation Laws, Americans are somewhat familiar, but, thank God, their pernicious effect was summarily ended here when the British connection was severed and the sovereign independence of the United States established in the glorious era of the Revolution. But, to return to Ireland, the English merchants and ship owners wanted no Irish competition in Colonial trade, and by these Navigation Laws, direct trade between Ireland and the Colonies was prohibited. Nothing could be imported into Ireland from the Colonies, except by the way of England, and nothing could be exported out of Ireland to the Colonies except in the same manner. In other words, Ireland could only do business with the Colonies through the agency of English middlemen, and when these middlemen were selfish and avaricious competitors, the prospects of the Irish manufacturer must have been the reverse of encouraging. In theory, Englishmen would have us believe that the relationship maintained between great Britain and Ireland is a kind of mutually beneficial partnership. From their point of view, it is theoretically sublime and practically superb. From the Irishman’s point of view, this relationship is not only galling to national and personal pride but absolutely ruinous to individual advancement or national progress. Under the peculiar articles of this co-partnership, it is provided that all of the benefits and profits shall be received by and paid over to the party of the first part-England, and that all of the disadvantages and losses are to be suffered and borne by the party of the second part-Ireland. This is not an over-statement of the proposition ; it is historically true. Charles II. prohibited the export of cattle, pork, bacon or dairy produce. The Irish people then resorted to wool raising and the manufacture of woolen fabrics, with the result, as I have told you, that it was decreed that Ireland could neither export woolen fabrics nor raw wool. Any attempt to build up industry with promise of success was immediately frustrated by a prohibitory act of Parliament until unjust and arbitrary legislation accomplished the utter annihilation of Irish trade. For over two hundred years, such were the conditions prevailing in Ireland, and is it surprising that the Irish became dissatisfied? English writers throughout all of this time accused them of being lawless. Deprived of property rights and of personal rights, prohibited from trade, persecuted in their religion, without opportunity for investment of capital, without market for labor, subjected to indignities and insults, with the jail and the gibbet as the penalty of even protest, and all of these infamous measures enacted and administered in the name of the law and carried out with all of its pomp and circumstance, is it any wonder that the people of Ireland looked upon the law of the land as an infamous iniquity, and plotted and planned and fought with a fury often wild and irresistible to rid themselves of a system which upon principles of natural justice, it was criminal mockery and sacrilege to dignify by the sacred name of law. The Dublin Parliament. We are told that Ireland had a Parliament in
those days. True, there was an institution in Dublin called by that name, but it
was the Parliament of the English garrison-not the Parliament of the Irish
people, and poor and miserable as this moribund body of place holders and
autocrats was, to further insure British interests, the Poyning Act of George I.
was enacted, by which all laws passed in the Parliament of England were made
operative in Ireland, while not only the Irish people, but not even the English
garrison in Ireland had a single representative at Westminster. And, talking of
representation, it is interesting to consider the character of the Dublin
Parliament as a representative body. Eighty per cent. of the population of
Ireland were Catholic, yet no person belonging to that faith was eligible to
membership in Parliament. Not only was this so, but until 1793 no Catholic could
vote at any election held for the purpose of electing members to Parliament.
Further than this, many of the members were virtually appointed by the Crown,
the established Church, or the landlords, and of the people who lived in
Ireland, native and settlers, not more than a fraction of one per cent. were
even privileged to vote at Parliamentary elections. Vast numbers of Catholic
artisans and laborers, thrown out of work in Ireland, went over to England in
search for employment, and in Cromwellian days, Irish peasants, men and women,
were deported by the tens of thousands to the Barbadoes and Jamaica, to work in
the sugar fields, a doom infinitely worse than that of negro slaves in the
cotton fields. At this period, too, the flower of the young manhood of Ireland,
baffled and betrayed by successive English claimants and pretenders, followed
their patriotic chiefs upon the Continent and took service under foreign flags.
The subsequent achievements of these Irish regiments and brigades form some of
the most brilliant chapters in the military history of France, Spain and
Austria, and in the providence of Heaven they were afforded many opportunities
of destroying the resources of England and causing humiliation to her monarchs,
as they beheld their scarlet legions stagger and fly before the irresistible
onslaught of the exiles from the banks of the Shannon, the Liffey and the Lee. Grattan’s Parliament. Now, there was a brief period of comparative prosperity in Ireland following the repeal of the Poyning Act, and of the establishment of the Parliament of Grattan. The rapid and splendid revival of prosperity during the following eighteen years was remarkable. The fishing trade, the linen trade, the iron trade, and the shipping trade flourished; great public works were inaugurated ; splendid public buildings erected and progress made in all lines of national life, with the result that British jealousy became again aroused and the infamous plot was entered into which resulted in the passage of the Act of Union eighteen years after. One of the worst libels directed against Ireland was that her sons were corrupt and bartered away her legislative rights for the bribes paid them by the infamous agents of Pitt and Castlereagh. When we recall how this so called Irish Parliament was constituted, we should feel proud of its patriotic record and glory in the fact that its dying hours if marked by scenes of infamy and disgrace, were also illumined by acts of heroism and sacrifice, and witnessed indignant protests expressed in words as thrillingly eloquent and sublimely defiant as ever assailed the ears of tyranny and oppression. The Union. The Act of Union was, however, unfortunately
and shamefully passed and Ireland was deprived of legislative power. There was
no department of her government, administrative or judicial, over which her
people had the slightest control. They had no initiative; the building of a
bridge or the repairing of a road, the pavement of a street, the construction of
a sewer or water system, were matters which could not be undertaken except by
permission of some central government board with offices in Dublin, the members
of which held life places directly under the Crown and were neither in sympathy
with nor responsible to the people. Nothing was done by Parliament to revive
industry; the landlords, the owners of the soil, were entrenched in privileges,
the tenants or occupants thereof were bereft of rights. The government of the
island seemed to have had but two functions; to levy taxes; to collect rents.
The industrious were worse off than the thriftless, for the more by their toil
they improved their holdings, the greater the rents they were forced to pay,
until it became manifest that no matter what the objects were British
statesmen had in view, the result of their policy was to impoverish upon the one
hand and to squander upon ,the other. Agricultural lands were mortgaged and rent
racked to the last penny that could be extracted to enable the proprietors to
spend with lavish hand the blood money of a people to uphold their social
prestige, or worse, in foreign society. We who enjoy the rights of freemen know
how vigilant and ceaseless must be our efforts to restrain official extravagance
and prevent squandering of public funds, and we are consequently in a position
to appreciate the unfortunate position of the taxpayers of Ireland, who were
taxed without representation and plundered without redress. To move the imperial
Parliament to consider or enact remedial laws, to meet or remedy Irish
grievances, was a useless waste of energy and a total loss of time, but, it must
not be imagined from this that Ireland was neglected by the law-making power; on
the contrary, Parliament in some respects was more than generous to her. It was
very liberal in passing coercion acts, in passing acts to suspend the privilege
of habeas corpus, to proclaim martial law, in passing acts to facilitate jury
packing, to stifle free speech, to muzzle the press, to deny the right of
assembly. The Irish people never had to petition for the passage of such laws.
One of the first fruits of the Union was the reduction of Dublin to a provincial
city, and this in turn became the fruitful cause of what has been described as
absenteeism,-that terrible drain upon the revenues collected in the shape of
rent from the tillers of the soil, the greater part of which was expended abroad
without contributing a penny by way of return to home industry or trade. The
tenant farmer left without security of tenure became now the prey of a class of
middlemen, each of whom became a petty oppressor and licensed local tyrant. The
proctor and the bailiff became familiar figures, and darkness and evil
invariably followed in their shadow. The Irish Constabulary was organized ; the
Crow Bar Brigade was called into requisition. The home of the disarmed farmer,
the hovel of the defenceless peasant were the fortifications these drilled and
armed warriors attacked, and their attacks soon became matters of daily
occurrence. Famine was beginning to spread over the land threatening death to
millions of the inhabitants, and what did the Parliament of the United Kingdom
do now ? It did something; it appointed a commission to inquire into the
condition of the Irish peasantry, and this commission, after long delay, many
hearings and deep consideration, reported what every member of the commission
and of the Parliament that created it knew long before its appointment, that the
Irish agricultural laborer was the worst housed, the worst fed, the worst
clothed, and was undergoing greater suffering than any of his class in Europe;
but nothing was done further, and soon the anticipated famine became a frightful
reality; that famine which was the direct result of conditions traceable to
Parliamentary union with Great Britain and the destruction of Irish legislative
independence. From 1800 to 1840, the population had grown from five to eight
millions of souls, and ever since Catholic emancipation was granted, as
Wellington admitted as the only means of preventing a revolution, the matter of
the reduction of Ireland’s increasing population was the subject of much
Parliamentary debate and anxiety. In ‘45 and ‘46, the failure of a single
product deprived hundreds of thousands of the Irish peasantry of the one article
of food which their limited resources had forced them for many years to mainly
depend upon. The government of England apprehended danger but took no step to
avert it, and now that men, women and children were starving by the tens of
thousands, the Government stood supinely by and exercised none of the
extraordinary governmental functions which are always resorted to upon the
ground of humanity in the face of extreme emergency to avert dire calamity, to
reduce to a minimum unutterable woe. All of the powers, revenues and resources
of Ireland had been transferred to London over forty years before, and the
co-relative duty was on the Prime Minister and the Parliament to take effective
measures to prevent the threatened holocaust. O’Connell and other thoughtful
men appealed to the government at least not to permit the export of grain from
Ireland until the minimum of food was secured for the starving multitude. This
could not be done, said the Minister; it was a wrong proposal upon economic
grounds; it would be an unwarrantable interference with the natural law of
supply and demand. Imagine a city invested by a powerful enemy who are
endeavoring to break through its ramparts, and a starving people inside, what
would be thought of the governor who would not protect such provisions as were
within its walls for the use of the besieged upon the ground that by doing so,
he would be interfering with the theoretical operation of the law of supply and
demand. |